Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 9:02:19 GMT
There are several ways to evaluate the works submitted at the event.
From the simplest to the most complex methodology, it is necessary to define, according to the proposal of your event, the one that best suits your needs.
Always remember that the process of evaluating submitted works is one of the most important factors in maintaining the quality of an event. Be it a scientific conference, a week or an academic day.
–> Do you know how to differentiate a Czech Republic Mobile Number List course from a workshop? A congress of a symposium? Discover 12 types of academic and scientific events here.
Therefore, maximum attention must be given to the evaluation of scientific works.
Types of work evaluation
One tip to facilitate the evaluation of works is to standardize the way in which participants should submit them. Therefore, at these times, using a work template is essential.
–> Do you need help standardizing your event’s work? Send our model, according to ABNT, to your participants.
Standard assessment
In standard assessment, a work can be failed, approved or approved with reservations.
In the case of works approved with reservations, the material is sent back to the author so that he can make adjustments or corrections.
After making the changes, the author must forward it to the event organization so that the work can be checked again by the evaluators and, only then, published.
Peer review
When evaluating works by peers, the material must be evaluated by experts in the area in which the work was submitted.
Sometimes peer assessment takes time to be carried out, as it is difficult to find experts to evaluate the work.
From the simplest to the most complex methodology, it is necessary to define, according to the proposal of your event, the one that best suits your needs.
Always remember that the process of evaluating submitted works is one of the most important factors in maintaining the quality of an event. Be it a scientific conference, a week or an academic day.
–> Do you know how to differentiate a Czech Republic Mobile Number List course from a workshop? A congress of a symposium? Discover 12 types of academic and scientific events here.
Therefore, maximum attention must be given to the evaluation of scientific works.
Types of work evaluation
One tip to facilitate the evaluation of works is to standardize the way in which participants should submit them. Therefore, at these times, using a work template is essential.
–> Do you need help standardizing your event’s work? Send our model, according to ABNT, to your participants.
Standard assessment
In standard assessment, a work can be failed, approved or approved with reservations.
In the case of works approved with reservations, the material is sent back to the author so that he can make adjustments or corrections.
After making the changes, the author must forward it to the event organization so that the work can be checked again by the evaluators and, only then, published.
Peer review
When evaluating works by peers, the material must be evaluated by experts in the area in which the work was submitted.
Sometimes peer assessment takes time to be carried out, as it is difficult to find experts to evaluate the work.