Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 8:49:47 GMT
There are perverse alliances that are not even intentionally forged and are the result of inertia that should be reviewed. Some politicians understand that they cannot publicly maintain their ideas when an electoral campaign is called. Certain economic interests move their propaganda tools to distort news that manages to captivate the media. The union of such elements causes a misinformation storm that makes us shipwreck in so much fog. The mirages of hoaxes repeated ad nauseum manage to set another computer course and distract us from what really counts. The Minister of Consumer Affairs gave an interview in which he discussed very interesting topics related to his powers, what would be the case of our eating habits and the improvement of the products to be consumed with a sustainable strategy that is less harmful to the environment. Hence the distinction between extensive and intensive livestock farming. One model relies on traditional farms or hamlets, where families take care of their livestock as well as the environment. Pastures come to shape and preserve natural spaces of great beauty, enjoyed by the neighborhood and occasional walkers.
The other seeks greater profitability without stopping in mind and its progressive mechanization should not ensure many stable jobs either. On the other hand, there are serious indications that they pollute much more even the nearby rivers and offer an inferior quality product. The cows have not gone crazy, but this delirious distraction maneuver ends up making us crazy We are facing Malta Phone Number a debate of great interest. But instead of exchanging opinions regarding our nutrition and the environment, we attend a ceremony of confusion, where everything is settled by making a minister resign due to the smoke of the fallen leaves that burned around his statements. Instead of concentrating on examining what the mother of the lamb may be, we play at sacrificing a scapegoat, as if this trade-off would not give us a hard time. The cows have not gone crazy, but this delirious distraction maneuver ends up making us crazy. When early elections are called, trusting in the polls and wanting to repeat Ayuso 's maneuver to fire his orange government partner, Mañueco has considered that it may be very profitable for him to make fun of that nonsense. Casado takes the opportunity to accuse the president of the government and his connivance with the bad companies that allow him to continue in Moncloa. All of this is as bad as it is predictable.
However, it is more striking that some barons of the socialist party decide to enter the fray to favor their particular San Martín. Or that certain members of the executive classify Garzón's statements as unfortunate and inopportune. One of two. If he had expressed an opinion that was harmful to the government's guidelines, he would have to be abruptly fired in the midst of the scandal. And if not, he would have to be supported by the collegiate body to which he belongs. Once again, we go around the bush and neglect the main point. What is the problem with the statements made to The Guardian ? Its contents or the commotion that has arisen in the middle of an electoral campaign? Garzón is honored to maintain what he said and which, in his opinion, is part of the government coalition pact and is in accordance with the European guidelines that address these issues . It is disconcerting, however, that he would not say the same thing again, if he had known that there was an electoral campaign in the making.
The other seeks greater profitability without stopping in mind and its progressive mechanization should not ensure many stable jobs either. On the other hand, there are serious indications that they pollute much more even the nearby rivers and offer an inferior quality product. The cows have not gone crazy, but this delirious distraction maneuver ends up making us crazy We are facing Malta Phone Number a debate of great interest. But instead of exchanging opinions regarding our nutrition and the environment, we attend a ceremony of confusion, where everything is settled by making a minister resign due to the smoke of the fallen leaves that burned around his statements. Instead of concentrating on examining what the mother of the lamb may be, we play at sacrificing a scapegoat, as if this trade-off would not give us a hard time. The cows have not gone crazy, but this delirious distraction maneuver ends up making us crazy. When early elections are called, trusting in the polls and wanting to repeat Ayuso 's maneuver to fire his orange government partner, Mañueco has considered that it may be very profitable for him to make fun of that nonsense. Casado takes the opportunity to accuse the president of the government and his connivance with the bad companies that allow him to continue in Moncloa. All of this is as bad as it is predictable.
However, it is more striking that some barons of the socialist party decide to enter the fray to favor their particular San Martín. Or that certain members of the executive classify Garzón's statements as unfortunate and inopportune. One of two. If he had expressed an opinion that was harmful to the government's guidelines, he would have to be abruptly fired in the midst of the scandal. And if not, he would have to be supported by the collegiate body to which he belongs. Once again, we go around the bush and neglect the main point. What is the problem with the statements made to The Guardian ? Its contents or the commotion that has arisen in the middle of an electoral campaign? Garzón is honored to maintain what he said and which, in his opinion, is part of the government coalition pact and is in accordance with the European guidelines that address these issues . It is disconcerting, however, that he would not say the same thing again, if he had known that there was an electoral campaign in the making.